TileCalorimeter

 
A summary of the scan results for all of the US EB modules can be seen in the Postscript files listed below:

Average  response vs. Module using Larry Nodulman's peak analysis for Cs Scans
Average  response vs. Module using CERN's (Bob Stanek) peak analysis for Cs Scans

These plots have been generated from a summary ntuple (modules.ntp, bsmodules.ntp) that contains one row for each layer for each PMT for each module.  The ntuple contains the following 14  columns:
MODL  SCAN  LAYR  CELL  PMT  SIDE  NTILE  SIGMA   SO-E  S0+E  NBAD STILE SGEOM ADCAVG, where

• MODL is the module number;
• SCAN = 1 (2 ) for LED (Cs);
• LAYR = 0  (1:11) for samples normalized to 100 over all tiles on this PMT (within a tile layer);
• CELL = nxx with n = 0:3 for readout depths A:D, and xx = the eta index of the cell;
• PMT = the PMT number;
• SIDE = 1 (2) for Odd  (Even) PMT;
• NTILE is the number of tiles in the sample;
• SIGMA = the rms variation of the sample;
• SO-E (SO+E) = the rms variation of the Odd - (+) Even sides of the tiles divided by sqrt(2);
• NBAD = the number of tiles in the sample that are less than 70% of the average;
• STILE = the rms variation in this sample due to tiles: Sqrt{<[Odd PMT - <Odd PMT>]*[Even PMT - <Even PMT>]>};
• SGEOM = the rms variation between layers in the sample :Sqrt{<(layer normalized - cell normalized)^2>};
• ADCAVG = the average ADC peak for this sample.

Additional information can be found at the following links:

Tile response for all  MSU Modules
Average response vs. PMT
Comparison of the LED and Cs Scans
Systematics of the LED and Cs Scans

Details of the modules instrumented at ANL can be found on:

Dave Underwood's page and on Larry Nodulman's page.