DUE: continuing,
one per week on the following
Monday.
POINTS: 34
percentage points total (see
the Details page). There are 15 weekly
journal entries which includes a single
introduction for the first submission
and a single conclusion with the last
submission. Weekly entries will be
graded on a basis of 7 scoring
points each. However, for very unusual
effort, up to 9 points might be
awarded.
DOCUMENTS: Refer to
MS Word
template.
DESCRIPTION:
The ISP213H Journal
should be a record of your intellectual
development during this course. It will
be written in weekly stages...with a
special entry at the beginning and a
special entry at the end. Occasionally,
there will be specific issues––a
question or a simple calculation--that
you'll be asked to address in a
particular entry.
It should
be written in the first person and
should be a narrative,
connecting one entry to the other. I'm
hoping for the whole to be like a
story.
Refer to the template...There are 3
kinds of entries:
-
Introduction.
The first entry should be an
Introduction to you and some
considerations as to why you have
chosen to take this course. What are
your initial impressions and
expectations? This first entry also
has a "weekly" component to it as
well.
-
Weekly
Entries. The
second kind of entry is repeated
each week––so the journal gets
bigger and bigger. In each, you
will have 3 sections:
- Reaction.
Almost every entry will have
something for you to "react to,"
be it a question, a response or
reaction to a reading, an
exercise, or a problem.
- Three Major
Topics. For the week's
material, you should just
enumerate the three topics that
we discussed and you read which
you think were important to your
understanding. They may not be
what I thought were most
important. I want to know what
grabbed your attention.
- Summary.
Then, you should give a brief
summary of the material of the
lectures in a few pages in this
or an equivalent font. Some
entries will be longer than
others and that should be driven
by the importance of the
material. Note that I'll use my
RACM method for grading. (What's
RACM, you ask? Look at the Help
page...) Please don't recite a
dry report of what I said, but
what (if anything) struck you
about it and why. You might
include instances of outside
discussions, things happening in
your other courses, informal
encounters (like TV, newspapers,
current events), trips you've
taken, and/or experiences you've
had. Refer to the readings
explicitly for full
"Completeness" credit. If I did
demonstrations, refer to them for
full Completeness credit. Be
interesting and do not be
boring.
- Questions.
Not required, but if you have
questions about anything in the
week, or something you saw in the
newspaper, whatever-ask! I'll try
to react to them in class or in
the blog.
-
Conclusion.
The third kind of entry is the
Conclusion. At the end of the term,
you should address your
Introduction again and state if
the course met your expectations or
if your expectations changed.This
will be in the Conclusion
section...which is sitting there
waiting for you all
semester.
This should be done every week and
is due at the beginning of each
Monday's class. So, for example, the
first Journal entry is for the week of
1/7, so it would include the lectures
and material supporting the lectures of
1/7 and 1/9.
Just print out those pages that
correspond to the relevant entry.
Staple
them! Each weekly submission
is worth 7 points and there will be a
penalty of 1 point per day in cases of
late submission.
On the
Template you'll notice that there
is stuff in blue...that's where
you write, but of course,
you'll do it in black (or whatever) and
eliminate my blue stuff. You'll also
notice that I've included a place for
your name (in blue) in the Header. That
way, when you turn in each entry, your
name will automatically be included.
So, don't forget to change the Header!
Finally, you'll see that I've included
a fake entry for the first lecture.
This should give you a sense of the
tone that I expect.
WHAT TO PUT IN YOUR SUMMARY
PART of the JOURNAL: I expect
you to summarize the points that are
made during lecture which are
important. This does not necessarily
mean to rewrite my slides in prose, but
it does mean that I want to know that
you a) realize what's important and b)
understood the principles. If you do
not fully understand something...write
about that. I'll comment to those
issues and try to help. If you're
surprised at something, or have figured
out a connection to something you've
experienced or always wondered
about...write about that. If I've done
a demonstration in class...write about
that. If you go elsewhere for
assistance and/or supplement to the
lectures...write about that.
- Roughly, an average Completeness
effort is about a page and a half,
sometimes more, not usually less. A
very unusual effort is more than
that.
- Notice that I will grade on
accuracy, so while we'll work to get
your understanding straight, I expect
you to have read outside of the
lecture slides to supplement your
understanding. So, if you claim
something incorrectly, but don't
indicate that you're uncertain,
that's "inaccurate." If you are
unsure about something, express your
uncertainty and what you've done
to fix it...that's then not
"inaccurate." Get it?
- This exercise is supposed to help
you to create the Whole of the
development of physics...from its
parts. It also is specifically
designed to help you to be ready for
the Wednesday quizzes.
- Do not
leave it to the day before the
deadline for submission - you'll
forget things. Do it right after
class! Allow time to edit, word
process, and proof read. Please write
well and correctly. In the RACM, the
"M" stands for mechanics. As an IS
course, and especially as an honors
course, there really should be zero
grammar, spelling, or syntax
mistakes...right? (Hint: proofread
your work.)
Here are 6 example journals that I
hope will help you to get into the
flow. Each of these students (they are
all different) did very well in
previous iterations of ISP213H. Each
did journal work that was always good,
sometimes very unusually good, and each
substantially helped their grade
through their journal effort! Some of
the rules have changed, so they don't
have the A-C (D) segments.
These are examples of really
well-done journal entries:
example1.pdf
example2.pdf
example3.pdf
These are examples of "very unusual
effort"- level journal entries:
example4.pdf
example5.pdf
example6.pdf
|